What’s Better For Your Gut: Lean Beef Or Chicken? Science Weighs In

Trending 1 month ago

Curious if reddish nutrient aliases chickenhearted is amended for your gut? This caller study reveals that thin Pirenaica beef could beryllium little disruptive to your gut microbiome than chicken, challenging communal dietary assumptions.

 bigacis / ShutterstockStudy: Effect of nan Consumption of Lean Red Meat from Beef (Pirenaica Breed) Versus Lean White Meat (Chicken) connected nan Gut Microbiota: A Randomized Cross-Over Study successful Healthy Young Adults. Image Credit: bigacis / Shutterstock

In a caller study published successful nan diary Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, researchers investigated nan effects of beef and chickenhearted intake connected nan gut microbiota.

The gut microbiota has emerged arsenic a cardinal facet successful quality wellness and disease. Likewise, fare tin modulate microbiome diversity, composition, and metabolic activity. Notably, nutrient intake has been criticized from environmental, health, and ethical perspectives.

The intake of processed aliases unprocessed reddish nutrient has been a consequence facet for type 2 glucosuria and cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, depletion patterns of animal-derived products person undergone important improvement successful caller years.

In summation to their shape, tenderness, and flavor, consumers are willing successful their imaginable wellness effects, sustainable accumulation methods, and origin. However, location is constricted grounds regarding nan effect of nutrient intake connected nan quality gut microbiota.

About nan study

In nan coming study, researchers evaluated nan effects of consuming beef and chickenhearted connected nan gut microbiota. This randomized, crossover-controlled proceedings included 2 involution phases. Participants were patient young adults without endocrine, metabolic, chronic, aliases nutrition-related diseases. Participants were, connected average, 20 years old, pinch nan mostly falling betwixt 18 and 22 years old. Only 16 individuals who completed stool sample postulation astatine each 4 clip points were included successful nan last analysis, resulting successful exploratory findings. They were randomized to a chickenhearted (lean achromatic meat)-based fare aliases a Pirenaica breed beef (lean reddish nutrient from cattle raised successful extended section husbandry systems)-based diet.

Participants were instructed to devour their assigned diets thrice per week and travel their accustomed diet. They started pinch a chicken- aliases beef-based fare for 8 weeks and past switched to nan replacement fare for different 8 weeks, pinch a five-week washout play betwixt nan 2 periods. The nutritional worth of some diets was similar. A nutrient wave questionnaire was administered astatine nan commencement of each intervention.

The fare value scale (DQI) was calculated to measure wide dietary habits beyond assigned products. Stool samples were collected astatine nan commencement and extremity of each intervention. Bacterial DNA was extracted from stool samples, and its attraction and purity were measured. The gut microbiota was analyzed by amplifying and sequencing nan 16S rRNA V3–V4 regions.

Relative abundances and alpha diverseness were calculated. A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank trial was utilized to measure differences successful alpha diverseness indices and comparative abundance betwixt nan commencement and extremity of each experimental period. Intervention effects were examined utilizing a linear mixed‐effects exemplary for repeated measures.

Findings

The study included 16 individuals, pinch an mean property of 20 years. There were nary important differences successful sociodemographic characteristics betwixt participants who started pinch a chicken-based fare and those who began pinch a beef-based diet. While nan baseline DQI was comparable betwixt groups, a important alteration successful DQI was observed aft nan chicken-based diet, which whitethorn person influenced nan consequent microbiota shifts.

After 8 weeks, nan group eating thin beef showed immoderate decreases successful definite types of gut bacteria, but only nan simplification successful Chloroflexota was considered statistically significant, meaning this alteration is improbable to beryllium owed to chance. There were nary notable changes successful wide gut microbial diverseness successful this group.

In nan group eating chicken, location were important reductions successful some Synergistota and Chloroflexota bacteria, arsenic good arsenic clear decreases successful measures of gut microbial richness and diversity. Statistical value intends these changes are improbable to beryllium owed to chance.

Looking much intimately astatine circumstantial bacteria, nan beef-based fare led to a important summation successful Blautia and decreases successful Eubacterium halli group, Roseburia, and Coprococcus. The chicken-based fare resulted successful decreases successful respective bacteria, including Eubacterium eligens group, Saccharofermentans, Bacteroides, Adlercreutzia, and Lachnospira, and increases successful Blautia, Sphingomonas, and Family XIII AD3011 group.

The linear mixed exemplary revealed that some dietary interventions had a important power connected bacterial phyla. Both diets were importantly associated pinch reductions successful Synergistota and Chloroflexota and an summation successful Bacillota. Moreover, some diets importantly decreased type richness, Shannon's index, and Fisher’s index. However, nan inverse Simpson scale showed a important simplification only aft nan preamble of nan chicken-based diet.

There was a important period-related effect: nan comparative abundance of Synergistota and Chloroflexota accrued while that of Bacillota decreased during nan 2nd period. In addition, alpha diverseness exhibited important increases successful type richness, Shannon, and Fisher’s indices during nan 2nd experimental play comparative to nan first period.

The chicken-based fare was associated pinch a broader alteration successful microbial functional capacity, including reductions successful pathways linked to nan initiation of fatty acerb biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, and nan biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids. Microbial functional activity was comparatively unchangeable aft nan beef-based fare intervention.

Conclusions

In sum, nan findings bespeak humble changes successful microbial creation astatine nan phylum level pursuing chicken- aliases beef-based diets, pinch nary important differences betwixt nan 2 interventions. While some diets decreased microbial richness and diversity, important reductions were only observed aft nan chicken-based diet, suggesting that nan beef-based fare mightiness person a comparatively milder effect connected microbial diversity.

The authors statement that results should beryllium interpreted pinch be aware owed to nan mini sample size and nan exploratory quality of nan study. Additionally, nan circumstantial section and extended accumulation strategy of nan Pirenaica beef whitethorn limit generalizability to different reddish meats.

Journal reference:

  • Rueda-De Torre I, Plaza-Diaz J, Miguel-Berges ML, et al. (2025). Effect of nan Consumption of Lean Red Meat from Beef (Pirenaica Breed) Versus Lean White Meat (Chicken) connected nan Gut Microbiota: A Randomized Cross-Over Study successful Healthy Young Adults. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, e70189. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.70189 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mnfr.70189
More