Tesla's Cult Still Can't Tolerate Valid Criticism, Even In The Face Of A Blatant 'bait And Switch'

Alex Wong/Getty Images

In theory, if you tin supply capable grounds to beryllium personification wrong, that's each it should return to alteration someone's mind. Unfortunately for everyone, study aft study has shown that's not really nan case. Everyone is susceptible to nan backfire effect, though cults are astir apt nan astir well-known illustration — their leader wasn't wrong, he conscionable misread nan signs aliases whatever. But if you thought Tesla die-hards had gotten immoderate little cult-y recently, a recent Wired article connected what judge sounds for illustration a classical Tesla bait-and-switch complete its so-called "Full Self-Driving" software will quickly disabuse you of that notion.

You see, erstwhile Tesla announced toward nan extremity of February that it would drop nan value of nan guidelines Cybertruck to $62,235 (including destination) for 10 days, it was a spot of an overseas move. Only 10 days? Really? That said, if you retrieve that Tesla sold half arsenic galore Cybertrucks successful 2025 compared to 2024, though, it makes a small much consciousness — gotta effort thing to boost sales. To sweeten nan deal, Tesla besides offered to let existent owners who had already bought the alleged "Full Self-Driving" software to transportation their licence to their caller car for free if they ordered a Tesla by March 31. Except, as Wired reports, Tesla quickly changed its mind:

Then Tesla softly amended nan connection of nan FSD transportation agreement, stipulating that customers would request to return transportation of a Tesla by March 31 successful bid to switch their FSD from their past conveyance to nan next. With Tesla's existent accumulation backlogs, that meant galore group were committed to buying cars that would get excessively precocious to make nan swap. The institution gave buyers nan action to cancel transportation and person a refund of nan $250 bid fee.

On X—which Musk owns and often uses, making it a favored societal media level for Tesla enthusiasts—the organization was livid. "Tesla still hasn't fixed their blatant FSD Transfer lies for nan $59k Cybertruck," fumed nan writer of an relationship called The Cybertruck Guy, which is focused connected nan polarizing steel-paneled EV. "What a pathetic disaster."

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Personally, I would reason that if you still return Elon Musk astatine his word successful nan twelvemonth of our Lord, 2 1000 and twenty-six, you merit each nan bad things that hap to you. But arsenic you tin imagine, immoderate of nan Twin Peaks regulars who ordered a caller Tesla, assuming they'd beryllium capable to transportation for free for illustration Tesla promised, were not happy erstwhile nan Austin, Texas-based automaker decided to alteration "ordered by March 31" to "delivered by March 31." In their clip of need, wherever other is location to move but Twitter and nan Tesla instrumentality forums? 

Sadly, this isn't a communicative astir precocious schoolhouse coaches who ne'er near their hometown realizing they've been worshiping a conman and uniting to yet show Elon they've had enough, are trading their Teslas. In fact, it's mostly nan opposite. Some Tesla buyers sewage mad, including 1 Twitter relationship called The Cybertruck Guy that tweeted, "Tesla still hasn't fixed their blatant "FSD [sic]" Transfer lies for nan $59k Cybertruck. What a pathetic disaster," but arsenic Wired explained, that sentiment was acold from universal: 

Such comments are not taken lightly successful nan Tesla bubble, wherever insufficient fealty to nan marque aliases Musk tin beryllium taken arsenic an effort to sabotage either. Another Tesla influencer screenshotted Cybertruck Guy's station to say: "Disappointing to spot what I thought arsenic respectable tesla accounts calling Tesla 'liars'. Time to artifact these morons."

Logically, these chumps should beryllium capable to admit that Tesla said 1 thing, group bought cars based connected nan point Tesla said, Tesla later changed its mind, and now, nan group who spent money based connected Tesla's announcement consciousness betrayed. That's a normal point to consciousness erstwhile personification lies to you, but their brains don't deliberation logically. Because, successful galore ways, Tesla is simply a cult. As for those who do get out, it sounds for illustration witnessing "FSD's [sic]" vulnerable failures is what pushed them complete nan edge.

The 3rd erstwhile Tesla enthusiast that Wired talked to is arguably nan astir important but besides nan slightest interesting, truthful let's conscionable spell up and get Dan O'Dowd retired of nan measurement correct astatine nan top. If you haven't heard of the software-engineer-turned-anti-Tesla-safety-advocate by now, you astir apt aren't paying overmuch attraction to Tesla aliases nan remainder of nan EV industry. But did you cognize that a decade ago, O'Dowd was a self-described "big fan" of Tesla who owned 2 Roadsters and a Model S? Well, he was, until early versions of Tesla's alleged "Full Self-Driving" software proved excessively unreliable to beryllium safe. In 2021, he launched nan Dawn Project, and today, he mightiness beryllium Public Enemy #1 to nan Tesla cult.

As correct arsenic O'Dowd is astir Tesla's reckless disregard for safety, he's besides a billionaire who designed operating systems for combatant jets, which isn't precisely "normal." In comparison, Earl Banning, nan Anchorage, Alaska-based psychologist sounds much for illustration personification you mightiness really meet successful public. As a healthcare professional, Banning told Wired that Musk's pandemic-era posts kicked disconnected his deconstruction, but what really sealed nan woody was really vulnerable nan original type of "FSD [sic]" proved to be. As Banning explained to Wired, he realized that "either Elon is lying aliases he's brain-damaged aliases something, because there's nary measurement you could beryllium successful that car successful 2020 and deliberation that it's going to beryllium vanished soon." 

Then there's Jilianne (Wired withheld her past sanction to protect her privacy), a Los Angeles-based Tesla proprietor who claims she still loves her 2022 Model S Plaid but can't guidelines really buggy "FSD [sic]" still is. She said it's amended now compared to earlier versions of nan software, but not capable to lucifer nan level of capacity Elon claims. As Wired put it, "she believes she was sold a driver-assistance characteristic that has grounded to unrecorded up to nan advertising, and nary longer trusts what Musk aliases Tesla opportunity astir ongoing upgrades to it, aliases what level of hardware will beryllium needed for genuinely autonomous driving, should nan institution ever execute that." 

Pool/Getty Images

Before Tesla released nan original type of "FSD [sic]", Banning and Jilianne were some progressive members of Tesla's online organization pinch ample followings, particularly connected Twitter. If they'd conscionable kept their mouths unopen astir their problems pinch the flawed package and continued showering a intelligibly naked emperor pinch compliments connected his good clothing, they astir apt could person maintained their level of fame and made plentifulness of money doing it. But if there's 1 point you don't do arsenic portion of Tesla's online community, it's mobility thing nan God King says aliases does. Tesla is Elon Musk, Elon Musk is Tesla, and you amended not person thing antagonistic to opportunity astir either:

As Banning began to definitive his reservations astir Tesla's claims and Musk's character, he mislaid scores of followers and fell retired pinch friends connected societal media. The last straw came successful December 2022, erstwhile Banning had nan chance to reside nan CEO straight successful a Twitter unrecorded chat. Banning says he told Musk of his interest that his incendiary governmental comments, which were becoming much frequent, could wounded Tesla. "I said my kid is transgender, who had ever been a large instrumentality of Tesla, but astatine this constituent they're not because of nan things you're saying astir that community," Banning says. Musk waved disconnected nan remark, saying he wouldn't suppress his views to boost Tesla's banal price.

As for Jilianne, who has now reportedly posted much than 170 hours of videos highlighting problems pinch Tesla's Level II precocious driver-assistance software, pointing retired problems. She mislaid followers,  sewage blocked by different Tesla influencers, and recovered different organization members weren't receptive to immoderate disapproval of their favourite Boer aliases his electrical car institution that's allegedly nary longer a car company. "They would conscionable say, 'Oh, you're ungrateful,'" she told Wired earlier adding, "They would make each kinds of excuses." You know, because you should beryllium grateful you're fortunate capable to thrust a Tesla, moreover if it occasionally tries to termination you because the CEO's excessively emotionally vulnerable to yet admit lidar makes self-driving cars safer.

Ultimately, there's thing logical astir cult behavior, but according to Jilianne, nan divided dads who shriek astatine umpires calling their kids' t-ball games can't extremity doubling down connected Tesla and Elon Musk for precisely nan logic you'd expect — that sweet, sweet, wildly overinflated banal price that they request to support going up astatine slightest until nan power decease of nan universe. As she told Wired, "To maine it's a batch astir nan money, much astir nan money than it is Elon—even though they opportunity it's Elon."

There's besides much to nan original post, and it's immoderate earnestly absorbing reporting, truthful beryllium judge to head complete to Wired to springiness nan full point a read.