Older Adults Reveal What Makes Or Breaks A Shift To Plant-based Protein

Trending 2 weeks ago

A Dutch study reveals that older adults want plant-based diets that sphere musculus and sensation good, but knowledge gaps, habits, and doubts astir substitutes guidelines successful nan way.

 dropStock / Shutterstock

Study: Perspectives of adults aged 55+ on plant-based diets rich | successful protein. Image Credit: dropStock / Shutterstock

In a caller study published successful nan journal Scientific Reports, researchers successful nan Netherlands identified facilitators and barriers for adults aged 55 years and older to adopt predominantly plant-based diets that still meet macromolecule needs for musculus preservation.

Background

Every decade aft midlife, spot slips while macromolecule needs rise, and tin plant-forward eating still protect muscle?

Sarcopenia raises risks of falls, fractures, mortality, and disability. Adults are advised to devour 0.83 grams per kilogram per day; older adults require 1.0 grams per kilogram per day, and up to 2.0 grams per kilogram per time erstwhile sick aliases active.

Moving toward 60% works macromolecule tin trim emissions but whitethorn little macromolecule intake and alteration nan readiness of basal nutrients, including vitamin B12, calcium, iron, eicosapentaenoic acerb (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acerb (DHA). The insubstantial besides emphasized that works proteins mostly person little digestibility, absorption, and value compared pinch animal proteins, making adequacy a challenge.

Taste, habits, cost, and knowledge style choices, and further investigation is urgently needed.

About nan study

This qualitative study utilized 3 attraction groups to research perspectives of Dutch adults aged 55–74 years connected adopting predominantly plant-based, protein-rich diets.

Participants (n=30) were recruited via assemblage networks and a nationalist fittingness center, provided consent, and completed a short questionnaire connected age, gender, nutrient intake, and exercise.

Sessions (April–June 2023) were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymized, and held either successful personification aliases online via Microsoft Teams. A semi-structured guide, aligned pinch nan Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model, steered discussions of skills, experiences, facilitators, barriers, and applicable needs. Two moderators facilitated each session.

Analyses followed a thematic study attack pinch a two-step process: 3 researchers independently performed inductive unfastened coding, and past deductively mapped codes to COM-B categories, labeling each arsenic a provider aliases barrier. Discrepancies were resolved done consensus.

MaxQDA package supported coding, and codification frequencies were reported. The study adhered to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines and received morals support from nan Hogere Agrarische School (HAS) Green Academy Ethics Committee.

The researchers maintained neutrality, disclosed their professions aft each convention to limit bias, and judged information saturation to beryllium achieved aft 3 groups. Demographics were summarized utilizing counts, distribution, and nan interquartile scope (IQR) for age.

Study results

Thirty adults (14 men, 16 women; median age, 63 years; IQR, 60–67) participated successful 3 attraction groups, each lasting 80–100 minutes. Most exercised 2 to 3 times weekly; nutrient intake ranged from little than 1 time to 7 days per week.

Health and sensation dominated each conversations, acting arsenic some facilitators and barriers. Participants wide viewed health, peculiarly nan preservation of muscle, arsenic nan superior logic for expanding protein; immoderate saw plant-based eating arsenic healthy, while others doubted nan benefits aliases worried astir processed nutrient alternatives.

Taste was described arsenic some a beardown motivator and a deterrent—some preferred acquainted nutrient flavors, while others enjoyed definite plant-based options.

Within Capability, knowledge-enabled action: knowing macromolecule sources, explanation reading, and dietary guidance supported choices.

Knowledge gaps and constricted cooking acquisition hindered change, peculiarly owed to uncertainty astir replacing animal products pinch plant-based foods that lucifer macromolecule amount and quality.

Within Opportunity, societal power trim some ways: partners, children, friends, media, and clinicians could spark change, but family roles, pressure, aliases dependence connected a superior navigator could artifact it.

Limited plant-based options erstwhile eating out, arsenic good arsenic perceptions of longer mentation times, were further deterrents for some.

Cost was not ever a barrier; immoderate participants expressed willingness to walk much connected plant-based foods, akin to their choices pinch integrated foods.

Within Motivation, beyond wellness and taste, biology effect and animal use were mentioned arsenic further benefits, but were not superior motivators for astir participants. Some participants besides expressed skepticism astir whether choosing much plant-based foods would meaningfully trim biology impact, reflecting doubts astir the efficacy of specified changes.

Concerns astir nan little macromolecule density of works foods and nan salt, sugar, aliases saturated fat contented of immoderate nutrient substitutes reduced enthusiasm.

Many participants besides expressed profoundly antagonistic views of processed substitutes, describing them arsenic “unappetizing,” “too processed,” aliases moreover “disgusting.”

Habits anchored routines (“always immoderate nutrient aliases fish”), making gradual, “fifty-fifty” shifts much acceptable than abrupt change.

Participants projected applicable supports, including look packs, repast examples, and merchandise lists; a “replacement list” linking animal products to works alternatives pinch balanced macromolecule content; integer aliases insubstantial diet-tracking devices to build awareness; and transparent on-pack accusation that shows nan biology footprint alongside nutrition.

Overall, mapping themes to COM-B highlighted knowledge (Capability) and societal discourse (Opportunity) arsenic pivotal levers, pinch wellness and sensation (Motivation) arsenic decisive tipping points.

Participants contrasted full foods pinch processed substitutes, describing nutrient analogs arsenic “unappetizing” aliases “too processed,” yet immoderate reported affirmative experiences pinch legumes, nuts, eggs, and dairy.

Perceived convenience mattered: those pinch clip did not position mentation arsenic a barrier, whereas others preferred elemental swaps.

Eating retired constricted options and discouraged experimentation.

Many favored phased transitions, specified arsenic smaller portions of meat, meat-free breakfasts and lunches, aliases alternating days, complete complete elimination.

Requested devices included macromolecule targets per repast and examples tailored to emblematic Dutch dishes.

Conclusions

In adults aged 55 years and older, decisions astir transitioning to protein-rich, plant-based diets are influenced by wellness and taste, pinch knowledge, societal context, and habits shaping behavior.

People want foods that sphere musculus without sacrificing flavor, clarity connected really to switch animal proteins for illustration food aliases nutrient pinch legumes, nuts, dairy alternatives, aliases fortified options, and reassurance astir nutrient adequacy, including vitamin B12, iron, calcium, EPA, and DHA.

Improving sensory quality, offering substitution tools, and adding accusation whitethorn accelerate adoption.

The authors besides noted that nan study participants were mostly much health-conscious and physically progressive than nan broader Dutch organization aged 55 and above, which whitethorn limit nan generalizability of nan findings.

Journal reference:

  • van Oppenraaij, S. L., Putker, M., van Schaik, A., Weijs, P. J. M., & Verlaan, S. (2025). Perspectives of adults aged 55+ connected plant-based diets rich | successful protein. Sci Rep. 15. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-17087-x https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-17087-x
More