Most Us Neurologists Prescribing Multiple Sclerosis Drugs Receive Pharma Industry Payments

Trending 2 weeks ago

Nearly 80% of US neurologists prescribing narcotics for aggregate sclerosis (MS) received astatine slightest 1 pharma manufacture payment, pinch higher measurement prescribers much apt to beryllium beneficiaries, finds a 5 twelvemonth study of Medicare database payments, published successful nan unfastened entree journal BMJ Open.

And those successful receipt of these payments were much apt to prescribe that company's drugs, particularly if nan sums progressive were larger, sustained, and recent, nan findings indicate.

Because of nan lifelong quality of MS, effective therapies are usually continued indefinitely unless a patient's objective consequence changes, explicate nan researchers. And MS supplier prescriptions are Medicare's largest neurological supplier disbursal contempt making up a comparatively mini information of full claims, they add.

While antecedently published investigation indicates that manufacture payments are associated pinch accrued prescribing of marketed products, nary of these studies focused connected a marketplace arsenic competitory arsenic nan MS narcotics market, opportunity nan researchers. 

They truthful group retired to characterise manufacture payments to neurologists prescribing MS narcotics and find retired if nan receipt of specified payments mightiness beryllium associated pinch nan likelihood of nan preferential prescribing of that company's drugs.

They utilized publically disposable information connected payments made by pharma companies to doctors from nan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Open Payments level from 2015 to 2019.

Payments are classified as: investigation payments; ownership and finance interests; and wide payments. The researchers focused connected wide payments to neurologists, linking these to Medicare Part D data, which covers medicine drugs, utilizing National Provider Identification numbers and supplier names. 

Their study included 7401 neurologists who had prescribed illness modifying therapies (DMTs) for astatine slightest 1 year, issuing a minimum of 11 prescriptions, and 20 DMTs manufactured by 10 companies.

In all, 5809 (78.5%) neurologists received 626,290 chopped manufacture payments from astatine slightest 1 supplier company, totalling US$163.6 cardinal betwixt 2015 and 2019; 4999 (67.5%) neurologists received payments from 2 aliases much companies.

The mean individual magnitude received was US$779, but 10% of recipients amassed US$155.7 cardinal betwixt them-95% of nan full sums received–which suggests that supplier companies whitethorn selectively target high-volume prescribers, opportunity nan researchers.

Higher medicine volumes were associated pinch a greater likelihood of receiving immoderate costs type, peculiarly for consulting services, non-consulting services, specified arsenic speaking astatine an event, and travel/accommodation; nan highest number of discrete payments was made for nutrient and drink. 

The magnitude received was positively associated pinch medicine volume. Compared pinch those who received nary payments from a company, those who did, were 13% much apt to prescribe that company's drugs.

The strongest relation betwixt manufacture costs and prescribing tendencies was observed for non-consulting services. These neurologists were 53% much apt to prescribe that company's drugs. 

Larger payments were besides associated pinch a greater likelihood of preferential prescribing, rising successful tandem pinch nan size of nan costs received: US$50 was associated pinch a 10% greater likelihood of prescribing that company's drugs; US$500 pinch a 26% greater likelihood; US$1000 pinch a 29% greater likelihood; and US$5000 pinch a 50% greater likelihood.

Longer long of payments was different seemingly influential factor, ranging from a 12% greater likelihood of prescribing that company's narcotics for 1 twelvemonth of payments to 78% greater likelihood for 5 consecutive years. 

The recency of payments besides seemed to beryllium influential. A costs made 4 years earlier was associated pinch a 3% greater likelihood of prescribing that company's drugs, but a 34% greater likelihood erstwhile made successful nan aforesaid year.

This is an observational study, and arsenic such, nary patient conclusions tin beryllium drawn astir origin and effect. And nan researchers admit that their study was constricted to nan prescribing of Part D drugs, and couldn't found nan appropriateness of prescribing, nor for which patients much costly brand-name narcotics were astir suitable. 

A doctor's determination to prescribe is informed by galore different factors, including nationalist guidelines and/or organization protocols, security cover, and diligent preferences. These drivers are difficult to measure utilizing publically disposable data, but should beryllium considered erstwhile interpreting nan findings, emphasise nan researchers.

Nevertheless their "findings raise concerns astir excess pharmaceutical promotion efforts and their implications for expert prescribing for patients," they suggest.

"Promotional efforts to power prescribing are particularly concerning fixed nan drugs' important costs, peculiarly if much costly brand-name narcotics are being prescribed alternatively of appropriate, effective, generically disposable alternatives," they constituent out.

"The Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which led to nan creation of nan Open Payments Database, was an important measurement guardant successful making transparent nan financial conflicts of liking among physicians receiving manufacture payments.

"However, it remains unclear whether accrued transparency has mitigated these conflicts of liking and their effect connected prescribing behaviour, aliases simply fixed nan nationalist greater penetration into nan ample standard of manufacture payments made to prescribers," they conclude.

Source:

Journal reference:

Sayed, A., et al. (2025). Industry payments to US neurologists related to aggregate sclerosis narcotics and prescribing (2015–2019): a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095952

More