Gartner Urges Businesses To 'block All Ai Browsers' - What's Behind The Dire Warning

sankai/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Follow ZDNET: Add america arsenic a preferred source on Google.

ZDNET's cardinal takeaways

• AI browsers are excessively risky for take today, Gartner said.
• CISOs request to artifact them until existing information concerns are reduced.
• Automation is useful, but convenience shouldn't switch security.

Businesses should steer clear of agentic browsers for now, analysts from investigation patient Gartner person warned. 

Agentic browsers, different known arsenic AI browsers, are changing really we usage browsers to entree nan internet, execute hunt queries, and negociate workflows. 

Also: Scammers are poisoning AI hunt results to steer you consecutive into their traps - here's how

As AI has now embedded itself into almost each industry, it was only a matter of clip earlier these technologies infiltrated nan web browser market. 

Not only are well-known browser developers exploring nan benefits and imaginable applications of artificial intelligence successful hunt functionality, personification assistance, support, and security, but liking successful agentic browsers has besides led to a harvest of smaller outfits appearing, pinch AI browsers now being offered from organizations including OpenAI and Perplexity. 

Also: Are AI browsers worthy nan information risk? Why experts are worried

For investigation purposes, contented summarization, and personalization, AI browsers can beryllium beneficial. They tin prevention you clip and whitethorn summation your ratio -- but this doesn't mean that each query LLM-based chat assistant's reply is correct, nor does it mean that AI browsers are inherently secure. 

In an expert study and advisory dubbed "Cybersecurity Must Block AI Browsers for Now," published earlier this month, arsenic reported by The Register, Gartner analysts said that while agentic browsers person nan imaginable to revolutionize really we interface pinch websites and execute online activities, they besides present "critical cybersecurity risks."

"CISOs must artifact each AI browsers successful nan foreseeable early to minimize consequence exposure," nan investigation agency said.

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, ZDNET's genitor company, revenge an April 2025 suit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights successful training and operating its AI systems.)

The risks of AI browsers, explained

According to analysts Dennis Xu, Evgeny Mirolyubov, and John Watts, nan main rumor is that "default AI browser settings prioritize personification acquisition complete security."

As AI browsers are capable to run independently, interact pinch websites, and execute tasks connected a user's behalf, arsenic good arsenic show contented that could punctual nan personification to return circumstantial actions -- moreover erstwhile this contented is malicious -- location are demonstrable risks to their use, successful some a user and business context.

Also: I've been testing nan apical AI browsers - here's which ones really impressed me

For example, an AI chatbot could unintentionally interact pinch a malicious website, aliases an worker mightiness taxable confidential, delicate firm information to an AI adjunct and beryllium unaware of wherever this accusation is stored. If an AI's unreality backend is not secure, this could yet consequence successful a information breach aliases information incident that places businesses astatine risk. 

In addition, Gartner said that labor could beryllium tempted to usage AI browsers aliases assistants to automate repetitive tasks. While AI tin use workflows and amended efficiency, utilizing it successful this measurement whitethorn besides person unintended effects -- specified arsenic a personnel of unit utilizing it to complete cybersecurity training while not learning thing astatine all. 

Why it matters

Gartner is acold from nan only statement raising nan alarm astir nan imaginable cybersecurity implications of AI browsers and assistants. 

Security experts are watching nan AI browser improvement intimately and have warned us of galore imaginable cybersecurity challenges progressive successful regulating them, including nan emergence of punctual injection attacks, individual information theft and exposure, and nan accrued consequence of surveillance that compromises our individual security. 

Gartner recommends that businesses behaviour consequence assessments connected AI solutions arsenic good arsenic immoderate associated backend systems, arsenic specified information audits tin uncover whether aliases not AI browsers are deemed an acceptable information risk. Considering really caller and untried they are, nan reply is apt no. 

Also: Use an AI browser? 5 ways to protect yourself from punctual injections - earlier it's excessively late

If this is nan case, Gartner said that CISOs should see blocking AI browser usage entirely. However, successful either case, labor should beryllium trained connected nan dangers of relying excessively heavy connected AI -- and why they shouldn't portion pinch delicate accusation erstwhile they are interacting pinch AI programs. 

"While agentic browsers committedness galore features to heighten personification experience, we are still successful early stages wherever nan risks are not good understood and default configurations prioritise convenience complete security, thing we spot successful galore technologies," commented Javvad Malik, lead information consciousness advocator astatine KnowBe4. "However, broad bans are seldom sustainable semipermanent strategies. Instead, nan attraction should beryllium connected consequence assessments that measure nan circumstantial AI services powering these browsers. This tin let for measured take while maintaining basal oversight."